Thursday, October 11, 2007

Conservatives in Exile?

Here's an interesting piece on the Conservative dilemma with Rudy Giuliani. It brings up some salient points with regard to Executive responsibilities and promoting a culture of life at the national and international level. As the article demonstrates, Bush is to be applauded for his efforts in this arena. For all his faults, he has proven himself a courageous leader in the defense of the dignity of the person.
The “Pro-life, Pro-family” voting contingent require a candidate who sees threats as they do — as the pervasive efforts of cultural and social elites— and who is vigilant, and active, and courageous in response to these threats. President George W. Bush has been that champion, and his administration has proven just how much more there is for a conservative president to do to than to select judges, even Supreme Court justices.

For years now an effort has been underway at the United Nation, for instance, to reinterpret international law in the hope of creating a universal right to abortion on demand. Various forces at the U.N. also seek to redefine the family, to establish complete sexual autonomy for adolescents, to create a worldwide right to homosexual marriage, to depress world fertility rates, and to legalize cloning in order to create human embryos for medical research.

Bush has countered this entire agenda in spite of its yielding nothing politically for his efforts; in other words, Bush has acted as an authentic “Pro-life, Pro-family” advocate. Early in his administration, he established specific orders for his diplomats at the U.N.; they were handed a text, to be recited whenever controversy arose on life issues: the U.S. does not interpret any language in the current document to establish new international rights, especially a right to abortion. With this simple act, Bush defeated so many sophisticated plans, hatched in the world’s finest law universities, think tanks, and international agencies, and the cosmopolitan world of international elites seethed.

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZjQ5ZDk3MjJmNTJhMjFmMWRiNDEzNmU5NTkwNWZhMWI=

1 comment:

  1. My question is why isn't anyone taking Brownback seriously? I mean, I think he is a little hokey but at least he is on board with all the "life issues" that the religious right are behind. If he's out, are there any republican that match up with the religious rights platform?

    ReplyDelete