Friday, April 13, 2007

Catholics and Sacred Art


In so many ways, the fruits of the Protestant Reformation can still be seen in Europe. The great schism that bifurcated Western Christendom into Catholic and Protestant camps had far ranging consequences. Across the Continent, religious and political leaders, at the local and national level, viewed their nation’s religious association with Rome as a hindrance toward true independence at a time when nationalism was on the rise. The extent of Papal influence frosted many political leaders who took umbrage at a foreign pope asserting sweeping authority and demanding broad allegiance over all the faithful in the realm. The cultural and religious bonds that held the Continent together throughout the Middle Ages were gradually loosening. The potential for national greatness was enticing and quite often, lofty religious platitudes were issued forth by both Catholics and Protestants as a smokescreen to wage wars for territorial expansion and consolidation. While most of Europe ultimately remained Catholic, often at great costs, many regions and some entire countries succeeded in permanently breaking their ties with Rome.

One of the first things victorious religious revolutionaries did upon wrestling free from the Catholic Church was to consolidate and accentuate their status as independent churches and nations, free from the shackles of “Latinist” intrusion. As often was the case, Church property was swiftly confiscated and absorbed into the state to erase any vestiges of “papist” influence. Such acts of appropriation were a common occurrence in England and the Netherlands. To parallel the theological and doctrinal “simplification” they believed they were returning to via Protestantism, Lutherans and eventually all Protestants made it a point to simplify their houses of worship. In churches, paintings were reduced and statues eliminated. The expansive cathedrals of the Medieval period, with their dark corners, vaulted ceilings, stain glass windows and nooks and crannies, were gradually replaced by bland houses of worship stripped of aesthetic references to the divine. Catholic parlance like “altar”, “Sacrifice”, and “Sacrament”, were eclipsed by emphasis on table, meal and faith community.

In fact, just the other day I was having dinner with a friend of mine who has roots to England. She related to me that, even to this day, old churches in England reveal centuries-old displays of Protestant theological reeducation. Ely Cathedral for instance, located near Cambridge, contains a special chapel known as The Lady Chapel, originally dedicated to the Virgin Mary. After the English Reformation of course, the cathedral became a Protestant church. The Lady Chapel is filled with dozens of statues of various saints and the Virgin Mary. So far, so good, right? Well, my friend told me that the heads of the statues have long since been smashed off by Protestant “reformers”. So this beautiful, and ancient chapel, that still functions as a Christian house of prayer, displays dozens of decapitated statues. Touring the Cathedral, my friend assured me, is something of a surreal experience; as people go about their business of prayer and worship surrounded by these desecrated statues. The tour guide who led my friend and her family through the cathedral briefly commented on the statues in an insouciant, “matter of fact” style and then continued on with the tour. That Protestants chose centuries ago to leave these disfigured statues in place after their conquest of the cathedral, perhaps as a future reminder to Catholics, was and is pretty disturbing. My friend assured me that examples such as Ely Cathedral are abundant in formerly Catholic England.

As an early disclaimer, this commentary does not intend to suggest that historically, Catholic behavior in this regard has been beyond reproach. Many examples, unfortunately, can be cited of Catholic-incited desecration of sacred places. Crusaders plundered Jerusalem and sacked Constantinople, while a renegade band of Catholic and Protestant mercenaries succeeded in ravaging Rome mercilessly in 1527. So terrible was this act that one contemporary lamented, “In Rome, no Masses are celebrated and no church bells ring”. Tens of thousands were slaughtered, and the city itself was gutted of its treasures. Acts of desecration such as these however, were exceptional and were committed by Catholics who had clearly wandered from the path of righteousness. It has never been a part of official Church policy, at least in the West, to destroy sacred images. In addition there is no paucity of severe papal condemnations for Catholic perpetrators of violence.

Contrary to early Protestant aversion to sacred art, it has been the norm of Catholic teaching and tradition to promote religious art and music. The Counter-Reformation was a clarion call for artists to tap into their God-given talents to inspire the faithful through an appeal to the beautiful. Painting and sculpture was seen as an excellent way to educate the illiterate regarding the truths of the faith. But the Church’s appreciation for art also had a deep theological and anthropological strain to it. The Church teaches that creation, especially the human person, is in its essence good, albeit wounded and weakened by Original Sin. Christ’s Incarnation elevates the created world and the dignity of the person to an even higher level. He is “like us in all things but sin”, so in a very real way, He is more authentically human than the rest of us, since sin has no part in His human nature. Of course, sin was not part of God’s original plan for humanity; we chose it freely. So in light of Christ’s perfect human nature, it is easy to see how He shares a unique participation in the world, which was after all, created through Him. Creation itself is thus understood as graced and elevated supernaturally beyond measure. This means that there is a certain sacramentality to the created world, especially concerning the human body. Thus the artist’s attempt to represent the noble, even divine thread found in the created world is to be encouraged and applauded. It makes sense, then, how Protestant theology cannot appreciate art in the same way. For Luther and his disciples, creation was irreparably mangled as a result of sin. Christ’s redemptive act didn’t change this reality but covered it over. There’s nothing laudable about human nature, thoroughly corrupt as it is, so why attempt to depict it theologically? Why deceive people about the “dignity”, much less “glory”, of the human body when it is precisely that body and its lured passions that lead us astray? Holding that the veneration of sacred art smacked of the same degenerate paganism that brought down ancient Rome, Luther’s ilk bucked the 1,500 year-old Christian tradition of venerating religious images and icons; some of which still coat the walls of the early Christian catacombs. The destruction of the statues in The Lady Chapel in England, and elsewhere across the “reformed” Christian world, is merely a reaffirmation of Protestant theology and anthropology.

Catholic Europe rejected the misplaced scruples of Protestant Europe and wholeheartedly embraced the celebration of art and the beauty of the created world. In Rome and Florence especially, great artists like Michelangelo, Bernini, Bramante and Raphael, among others, worked feverishly to execute representations and portrayals of Christianity’s most revered people and memorable events. In Italy, sumptuous churches abound, housing some of the most stunning gems from the world of art. It goes without saying that you will not find anything comparable to Bernini’s Ecstasy of Saint Teresa in your nearby Dutch Reformed Church.

With the discovery of the New World, the Catholic tradition of promoting art made its way across the Atlantic as well. In the United States, from Baltimore and Milwaukee to San Diego, resplendent Catholic cathedrals and basilicas, reflecting their European patrimony, are in abundance. The Church understands that sacred art speaks to us, it elevates our thoughts, helping us in our quest for union with God. It is for this reason that the Catholic Church has been the world’s greatest advocate of authentic art. Correctly understood, sacred art is not an obstacle or distraction but a window and a doorway.

1 comment:

  1. I appologize if this isn't cohesive; I'm typing quickly.

    I agree. However, despite some strong Catholic pockets in the US, I think that the fact that our own country was founded on Protestantism of the most puritanical form, as opposed to Catholic Christianity, accounts for our overall current culteral state. Parts of Europe declined from the Catholic understanding of art and human dignity; America was founded on Puritan and Jansenist principles -- from which an understanding of art and human dignity was absent -- and declined from there. The current state of our culture is a reaction to this; this is why we are considered shallow, materialistic, and with a poor understanding of human dignity and art. We are reacting to a perverted scrupelosity and guilt that was not balanced by hope in God's goodness and the fundemental dignity with which we were created.

    ReplyDelete